In this electoral period, the admissibility of candidacies represents a fundamental democratic issue. In Cameroon, the body responsible for organizing and supervising elections, Elections Cameroon (ELECAM), published on July 26, 2025, the list of 13 candidates approved for the presidential election scheduled for October 12, 2025. Upon reviewing the resolution validating these 13 candidates, it appeared that 70 candidacies had been rejected. In such a context, the excluded candidates are entitled to a fundamental right: the ability to initiate judicial proceedings to contest the rejection decision.
I. Legal Framework Governing the Rejection of Candidacies by ELECAM
Article 10 of the Cameroonian Electoral Code vests the Electoral Council with the authority to examine candidacy files and to establish the final list of candidates.
According to the provisions of Article 125 of the same Code, the Electoral Council may either approve or declare a candidacy inadmissible. Paragraph 3 of said article provides that any decision rejecting a candidacy or publishing the list of accepted candidates may be appealed before the Constitutional Council.
The rejection of a candidacy is primarily based on the ineligibility of the applicant, which may result from the failure to submit the required documents, the late filing of the candidacy file, or the failure to prove payment of the legal deposit.
The rejection decision, duly reasoned, is notified to the concerned candidate by the Director General of Elections. A copy of the decision is immediately forwarded to the Constitutional Council, the sole judicial body competent to adjudicate electoral disputes in this matter.
II. Legal Remedies Available to the Excluded Candidate
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 129 of the Cameroonian Electoral Code, any dispute or claim regarding the acceptance or rejection of a candidacy may be brought before the Constitutional Council by any concerned candidate.
These appeals are lodged by simple petition, within two (02) days from the date of notification of the contested decision.
Once seized, the Constitutional Council must rule within a maximum period of ten (10) days following the filing of the petition.
Such an appeal has a suspensive effect, in that the Constitutional Council may, where appropriate, order the registration of a candidate who was wrongfully excluded. In this respect, the Constitutional judge exercises a legality review, examining both the formal regularity of the candidacy file and the conformity of the Electoral Council’s decision with applicable legal standards. The electoral judge thus plays a key role in safeguarding fairness and transparency throughout the electoral process.
Conclusion
Judicial review of ELECAM’s decisions rejecting candidacies is an essential safeguard of the right to political participation. It ensures that the decisions of the electoral body are subject to judicial scrutiny, in the interest of legality, fairness, and transparency in the electoral process. However, the effectiveness of this remedy largely depends on the diligence of the courts, the independence of the judiciary, and the candidates’ strict compliance with procedural deadlines. As the general elections scheduled for October 2025 approach, heightened legal vigilance is necessary to ensure that no one is unjustly deprived of their fundamental right to take part in the conduct of public affairs.
Here we break down the law in simple terms so everyone can understand it and engage in meaningful discussions with others.
Law Firm MBIDA KANSE TAH & Co – Message us on WhatsApp : +237 691 26 48 78